It should come as no surprise that I’ve been following the Minnesota Senate race recount with great interest. What you may not know is that I myself have served as an election judge in Minnesota in the past, so the state’s entire voting process is very near and dear to my heart.
Back in 1990, it was a topsy-turvy election day in the Gopher State. Two major statewide offices were being contested: the governorship and a U.S. Senate seat. Both races left conventional wisdom completely by the wayside.
In the Senate race, popular two-term IR (Independent Republican) incumbent Rudy Boschwitz suddenly found the DFL (Democratic-Farmer-Labor) dark horse, a political science professor and campaign neophyte named Paul Wellstone, pulling up neck-and-neck in the polls.
The gubernatorial contest had been thrown into turmoil by allegations that the IR candidate, Jon Grunseth, had made improper overtures to underage females. Grunseth quit the race nine days before the election — after the paper ballots for the now-familiar optical scanner sheets had already been printed. A pro-choice Republican, Arne Carlson, became the party’s nominee, running against three-term incumbent governor Rudy Perpich. Perpich was slipping rapidly in the polls; his pro-life stance had many liberal voters prepared to step away from voting a full DFL ticket.
I was working as a judge during the final shift of the day, and we braced ourselves for the crush of people arriving to vote after returning home from work. And turn out in my urban neighborhood they did, lined up shoulder-to-shoulder out the door and onto the sidewalk.
This being Minnesota, it’s hardly surprising that voters were polite to one another while they waited. But it was a lively, animated atmosphere that night in my demographically youthful neighborhood, strangers chatted and joked with one another as they slowly made their way forward in the queue.
The last-minute switch on the IR ticket in the governor’s race meant that a completely separate, supplemental paper ballot was printed for the gubernatorial contest. Voters needed to fill both paper ballots yet avoid casting votes for governor in the wrong place or in two places.
Part of my job as an election judge that night was to explain the two-ballot system. I stood on top of a table and in my best carnival barker voice, I went through a cheerful, systematic explanation of how to cast a valid vote. People smiled and laughed, and by the time I had worked my way through the entire spiel, a new set of voters gathered in the room, and I started the whole routine again from the top.
This went on for hours and hours that night. I must have repeated myself at least forty or fifty times. (If you think I was ever in danger of losing my voice for even an instant, people who know me in real life have a barrel of smirks to sell you.)
After the final vote was cast, the work of checking the spoiled ballots began. The Minnesota system of having representatives from both major parties working together to try to determine voter intent begins with the election judges in each precinct. We kneeled and hunched on the floor with each other, peering at slashes and squiggles and dutifully marking up duplicate ballots. We didn’t completely wrap up until sometime around midnight.
Split ballots were everywhere that night, with a huge swath of voters choosing pro-choice Republican Carlson for governor and ultra-liberal Democratic underdog Wellstone for the U.S. Senate. By the end of the night, both the incumbent Democratic governor and the incumbent Republican senator had lost their offices. The voting system had borne up under rather extraordinary circumstances.
So when I saw that the Coleman-Franken senate race this year was triggering an automatic recount, I knew just how robust and remarkably transparent the Minnesota system would prove to be. Now, after the state canvassing board has unanimously certified the recount numbers, the rest of the world knows as well.